MORALITY OF KILLING VALI
Vali is a paradoxical
character. In virtue, valour and strength he is equivalent to Rama. In misdeeds
he is equivalent to Ravana. Vali banished his brother Sugriv because he thought
that Sugriv had betrayed him but he did not allow his wife to go with him and
kept her with him an act of Ravana who abducted Sita. Vali get message from his spies that Rama was
on a mission to kill him but he did not believe it because there was no enemy
between Rama and Vali, he was sure that Rama will not interfere in the enemy
between him and Sugriv.
The most intriguing
ethical point in the epic is the killing of Vali by Rama. Vali has done no sin
against him. Rama does not kill him in direct combat either. The questions that
naturally arise are – why does Rama kill Vali? Why does Rama hide himself while
killing Vali? The justification of Rama
killing Vali reveals many the then socially accepted practices by men and lower
species viz. monkeys. Rama justifies before Vali why he kills him while Vali is
on the verge of death.
He contends that he
is a representative of Bharata and therefore he is authorized to punish the
offenders as per law. Vali tells Rama that he would have rescued Sita alone
after defeating Ravana as he alone had the strength to defeat Ravan. Though, it
is said that Ravana was a better characterthan Vali because Ravana never tried
to misbehave with Sita as Vali did to Sugriv’s wife.
What were the sins
committed by Vali? Dharma is very subtle and Vali should have known that a
younger brother is to be treated like one’s own son. But he is blind to dharma.
He is an offender in so far that he treats his brother’s wife as his own. This
act of adultery needs to be punished by killing the adulterer. But strangely a
younger brother may marry an elders’ wife after his demise. If Vali has
relations with Sugriva’s wife, it is adultery punishable by death. Referring to
the primitive practices of the monkey race, Tilaka argues that ‘the dharma of
marryin the brother’s wife when the elder brother is dead cannot be treated an
adharma for those lower beings when such an arrangement is not prevented among
the first three classes.’ There appears therefore an approval of the actions of
Rama against Vali. Being a father like figure Vali has erred in banishing
Sugriva from his country although Sugriva was innocent. Why does Rama kin Vali
by hiding himself behind a tree? For Rama, Vali is a monkey, an animal for
hunt. When kings hunt animals they conceal themselves and kill the prey.he has
therefore the justification for killing Vali by hiding himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment